center23002311409410012100center818008227695Name Class 941009200 Name
Class
center700007040880 Abstract
Physical Examinations are an integral part of preventative care, learning how to perform and evaluate during a physical examination is key to learning about the patient's current status and their overall health.
9410010000 Abstract
Physical Examinations are an integral part of preventative care, learning how to perform and evaluate during a physical examination is key to learning about the patient's current status and their overall health.
center300003017520 LESSON PLAN FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
With Literature Review
9410036300 LESSON PLAN FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
With Literature Review


Intended Audience
This classroom lesson plan is intended for nursing students. It is meant to teach them how to properly conduct physical examinations. More often than not, nursing students have questions related to proper handling of patients. A lot of times nursing students forget the basics such as confirming a patient's identity by asking them for their full name and birthday, checking the patient's weight, blood pressure, height, body temperature, and asking for personal medical history. It takes patience and practice in order to develop a good rapport with patients while also making the physical examination quick and efficient. There are many steps involved in performing a standard physical examination with patients needing to learn everything from checking for abnormalities to assessing patient movement, vision, and so forth.
Proposed Goals
* The purpose of performing periodic physical/health examinations is to assess the health status of a patient, along with proper screening of possible risk factors and disease by providing preventive counseling intervention in age-appropriate method (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2012, p. 112).
* The goal of evaluating and screening the patient is to prevent onset of illness or worsening of any existing illness. A good example is measuring patient's blood pressure in order to detect possible hypertension to begin treatment and prevent subsequent death through renal failure or stroke.
* A further goal of physical examination is to enable patient education about unhealthy environmental exposures or behavioral patterns that can often pose risks for future illness. Examples include counseling on keeping a healthy BMI to offset any obesity related diseases such as type 2 diabetes, and counseling on preventing smoking habits to keep risk of developing lung cancer low and practicing safe sex through the use of condoms to keep patient from getting any sexually transmitted disease.
Literature Review
Patient history is often a hurried and overlooked aspect of physical examination, this literature review will look at generated and modified questionnaires as a means for gather succinct and detailed patient history, a vital part of a preventative...

It will also look at the recent changes in medical practice and the use of technology to aid in providing simulated instruction ad practice to aid in fulfilling learning objectives. It is always important to keep up to date with the latest medical innovation and methods. Viewing how others alter their approaches to physical examination is a great way to learn and grow. In a study by Wendel-Vos, Schuit, Saris, & Kromhout (2003), they set out to determine reproducibility and relative validity of the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). A questionnaire such as SQUASH is an important an innovative way to approach patient medical history. It not only offers a new way to gather patient information, but it also uses current technologies, such as an activity monitor to view patient's behavior after the initial questionnaire. "Participants (36 men and 14 women, aged 27 - 58) were asked to complete the SQUASH twice with an inbetween period of approximately 5 weeks. In addition, participants wore the Computer Science and Applications (CSA) Activity Monitor for a 2-week period following the first questionnaire" (Wendel-Vos, Schuit, Saris, & Kromhout, 2003, p. 1163). Results proved the questionnaire to be useful and quick, especially for possible use in physical examinations. "Because the SQUASH is a short and simple questionnaire, it may proof to be a very useful tool for the evaluation of health enhancing physical activity in large populations" (Wendel-Vos, Schuit, Saris, & Kromhout, 2003, p. 1163). It is a reliable approach to patient history and a good addition to any lesson plan involving physical examinations.
In another study by Idler & Benyamini (1997) they examine the ever-expanding "number of studies of survey respondents' global self-ratings of health as predictors of mortality in longitudinal studies of representative community samples" (Idler & Benyamini, 1997, p. 21). The results of their findings were consistent with their hypothesis that "Global self-rated health is an independent predictor of mortality in nearly all of the studies, despite the inclusion of numerous specific health status indicators and other relevant covariates known to predict mortality" (Idler & Benyamini, 1997, p. 21). Their analysis of the studies helps to find better methods of research for students to learn more from a desired topic. This study also highlighted need for improvement in research methodology to continue improved performance and health standard.
Another questionnaire, assessing patient satisfaction in performance of daily activities through a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) demonstrated successful implementation of modifications to an existing standard questionnaire in order to get more accurate and detailed information from respondents. As Pincus, Summey, Soraci, Wallston, & Hummon (1983), "The HAQ includes questions to determine a patient's degree of difficulty and need for help and assistive devices in ADL. A modification of the HAQ (MHAQ) was developed to include questions concerning perceived patient satisfaction regarding the same ADL, along with perceived change in degree of difficulty" (Pincus, Summey, Soraci, Wallston, & Hummon, 1983, p. 1346). Their findings revealed: "A major determinant of expression of patient satisfaction was perceived change in difficulty: 81.4% of patients noting that their function was "less difficult now," in contrast to 16.9% of patients responding "more difficult now,"…